Elastic bonding films

ABSTRACT

Elastic bonding films that include an elastic, thermoset core layer and a thermoplastic bonding layer on each side of the core layer are described. The thermoset core layer is a polyurethane formed as the reaction product of (i) a multifunctional isocyanate with (ii) a combination of polyols comprising (a) polyester diol, (b) crosslinker, and (c) hard segment. Articles incorporating such elastic bonding films including fabrics bonded to such films are also described.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a national stage filing under 35 U.S.C. 371 ofPCT/US2009/049242, filed Jun. 30, 2009, which claims priority to U.S.Provisional Application No. 61/083,664, filed Jul. 25, 2008, thedisclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its/their entiretyherein.

FIELD

The present disclosure relates to elastic bonding films. The bondingfilms include an elastic, thermoset core layer and a thermoplasticbonding layer on at least one side of the core layer. The thermoset corelayer is a polyurethane formed as the reaction product of (i) amultifunctional isocyanate with (ii) a combination of polyols comprising(a) polyester diol, (b) crosslinker, and (c) hard segment. The presentdisclosure also relates to articles incorporating such elastic bondingfilms including fabrics bonded to such films.

SUMMARY

Briefly, in one aspect, the present disclosure provides an elasticbonding film comprising an elastic core layer bonded to at least onethermoplastic bonding layer. The core layer comprises the cured reactionproduct of a composition comprising a multifunctional isocyanate and acombination of polyols. The combination of polyols includes x molefraction of equivalents of (a) polyester diol, wherein x is between 0.25and 0.6, inclusive; y mole fraction of equivalents of (b) crosslinker,wherein y is between 0.15 and 0.4, inclusive; and z mole fraction ofequivalents of (c) hard segment; wherein z is between 0.2 and 0.45,inclusive; wherein the sum of x, y, and z is 1.

In some embodiments, the system functionality of the composition is atleast 2.05. In some embodiments, the ratio of isocyanate groups tohydroxyl groups in the combination of polyols is at least 1.05.

In some embodiments, the mole fraction of equivalents of polyester diol,crosslinker, and hard segment are selected such that SRC is less than30, wherein SRC=72 x+2378 y+967 z−4062 x·y+247 x·z−6445 y·z.

In some embodiments, the mole fraction of equivalents of polyester diol,crosslinker, and hard segment are selected such that ELC is between 500and 2500 kPa; wherein: ELC=4102 x+25,628 y+75,297 z+44,876 x·y−148,769x·z−199,804 y·z.

In some embodiments, the mole fraction of equivalents of polyester diol,crosslinker, and hard segment are selected such that SLC is between 500and 2500 kPa; wherein: SLC=10,203 x+66,635 y+109,567 z−7632 x·y−194,384x·z−345,379 y·z.

In some embodiments, the mole fraction of equivalents of polyester diol,x, is between 0.25 and 0.35, inclusive. In some embodiments, the molefraction of equivalents of crosslinker, y, is between 0.3 and 0.4,inclusive. In some embodiments, the mole fraction of equivalents of hardsegment, z, is between 0.35 and 0.45.

In some embodiments, the polyester diol is a five carbon dibasic acidpolyester polyol. In some embodiments, the crosslinker is a triol, e.g.,a glycerol. In some embodiments, the hard segment is an alkyldiol. Insome embodiments, the alkyl group of the alkyldiol contains 2 to 6carbon atoms.

In some embodiments, the thermoplastic layer comprises a urethane. Insome embodiments, the thermoplastic layer is a pressure sensitiveadhesive. In some embodiments, the thermoplastic layer is aheat-activated adhesive. In some embodiments, the elastic bonding filmfurther comprising a second thermoplastic layer bonded to the elasticcore layer.

In another aspect, the present disclosure provides an article comprisinga fabric and the elastic bonding film, wherein the thermoplastic layerof the elastic bonding film is bonded to the fabric. In someembodiments, the fabric has a stress relaxation, SRF, as measuredaccording to the “Stress Relaxation Test Method” and the mole fractionof equivalents of polyester diol, crosslinker, and hard segment areselected such that SRC is less than 1.2 SRF, wherein SRC=72 x+2378 y+967z−4062 x·y+247 x·z−6445 y·z. In some embodiments, the mole fraction ofequivalents of polyester diol, crosslinker, and hard segment areselected such that SRC is between 0.8 SRF and 1.1 SRF.

The above summary of the present disclosure is not intended to describeeach embodiment of the present invention. The details of one or moreembodiments of the invention are also set forth in the descriptionbelow. Other features, objects, and advantages of the invention will beapparent from the description and from the claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary bonding film according to someembodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 2 illustrates an article comprising an exemplary bonding filmaccording to some embodiments of the present disclosure bonded to asubstrate.

FIG. 3 illustrates an article comprising an exemplary bead-coatedbonding film according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 4 illustrates an article comprising a textured bonding filmaccording to some embodiments of the present disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

As used herein, all percentages are by mole unless otherwise indicated.As used herein, all ranges are inclusive, i.e., all ranges include theend points of the range. E.g., the phrase “between 1 and 10” includesthe values 1 and 10, as well as all values between these end points.

Advances in the garment industry are creating opportunities to identifynew and useful materials to improve clothing and address long-felt needsin the industry. For example, fabric attachment and clothingconstruction has traditionally been accomplished through sewingoperations. Recently, some clothing manufacturers have usedheat-activated adhesive films such as thermoplastic polyurethanes tobond fabrics together thereby improving the appearance and feel of thegarment.

Fabrics themselves have evolved to provide greater durability andperformance, and enable new design options. For example, elastic fabricshave been used to produce form-fitting garments including, e.g.,undergarments. Typical fabrics used in these applications exhibitapproximately 25 percent stress relaxation when strained at 30 percent.The primary reason to minimize stress relaxation is to avoid having thegarments feel as though they are becoming loose when worn.

Traditionally, shirrs have been sewn into a garment to improve the fitand to allow a single garment size to accommodate some range of sizes;thus, reducing the need to manufacture numerous intermediate garmentsizes. Elastic films have also been attached, e.g., sewn, to the fabricto accomplish these objectives. Materials used to produce these elasticfilms, such as most thermoplastic polyurethane films, exhibit 40 to 50percent stress relaxation when strained at 30 percent, which issignificantly greater than the approximately 25 percent stressrelaxation typical of the fabrics themselves.

Generally, the present disclosure provides a multilayer elastic bondingfilm comprising a thermoset core layer and at least one thermoplasticbonding layer. In some embodiments, the elastic properties of thebonding film are controlled by the properties of the core layer, whilethe bonding properties of the film can be independently adjusted bymodifying the thermoplastic bonding layer. The core layer also preventsthe thermoplastic bonding layer from “squeezing-out” during the bondingprocess. Squeeze-out can occur with conventional thermoplastic adhesivebonding films when the molten adhesive is either heated to too high of atemperature, which results in an excessive reduction in the viscosity ofthe adhesive, or through the application of too much pressure during thebonding process. The crosslinked nature of the core layer preventssqueeze-out and affords more control of the bonding process bycontrolling the geometry of the bond line.

The thermoset core layers of the present disclosure comprise apolyurethane formed as the reaction product of (i) a multifunctionalisocyanate with (ii) a combination of polyols comprising (a) polyesterdiol, (b) crosslinker, and (c) hard segment.

Generally, any multifunctional isocyanate (e.g., diisocyanate) may beused including aromatic and aliphatic isocyanates. Exemplary aromaticisocyanates include toluene diisocyanate (TDI) and diphenylmethanediisocyanate (MDI), as well as their oligomeric forms which providefunctionalities of three or more. Exemplary aliphatic isocyanatesinclude 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI), and isophoronediisocyanate (IPDI), as well as their oligomeric forms.

Exemplary polyester polyols include five carbon dibasic acid liquidpolyester polyols such as those available under the trade names“UrethHALL” from HallStar Company, Chicago, Ill., and “PRIPLAST” fromUniqema, New Castle, Del.; and polytetramethylene ether glycol basedpolyols, such as those available under the trade name of “polyTHF” fromBASF Company, Florham Park, N.J. In addition, polycaprolactone basedpolyols, such as those available from Perstorp Polyols Inc., areavailable in a wide variety of functionalities and molecular weights andafford a great deal of latitude in formulating crosslinked polyurethanecompositions. For ease of handling, polyols that are liquid at roomtemperature may be preferred; however, polyols that are solid at roomtemperature are also useful, particularly if exposed to heat sufficientto melt them prior to processing. In some embodiments, a combination ofpolyester polyols may be used.

As used herein “moles of equivalents” refers to the moles of functionalgroups. Thus, for a polyol it is the moles of equivalents of hydroxylgroups (OH), and for an isocyanate it is the moles of isocyanate groups(NCO). For example, for a diol or diisocyanate, the moles of equivalentswould equal two times the moles of the diol or the diisocyanate,respectively. Similarly, for a triol, the moles of equivalents wouldequal three times the moles of the triol.

“Mole fraction of equivalents” for a particular polyol is the ratio ofmoles of equivalents of that particular polyol divided by the moles ofequivalents for all polyols in the combination of polyols. Based on thisdefinition, the sum of the mole fraction of equivalents for all polyolsin the combination is 1.

In some embodiments, the combination of polyols comprises between 0.25and 0.60 mole fraction of equivalents of polyester diol based on thetotal number of moles of equivalents of (a) polyester diol, (b)crosslinker, and (c) hard segment. In some embodiments, the combinationof polyols comprises no greater than 0.40, e.g., no greater than 0.35mole fraction of equivalents of polyester diol.

The crosslinker has a functionality greater than 2.0, e.g., afunctionality of at least 3. In some embodiments, the crosslinker mayhave a higher functionality, e.g., 4. In some embodiments, thecrosslinker is a low molecular weight triol, e.g., glycerol (i.e.,propane-1,2,3-triol). Other exemplary crosslinkers includetrimethylolpropane, 1,2,6-hexanetriol, and triethanol amine. In someembodiments, a combination of crosslinkers may be used.

In some embodiments, the combination of polyols comprises between 0.14and 0.40 mole fraction of equivalents of the crosslinker based on thetotal number of moles of equivalents of (a) polyester diol, (b)crosslinker, and (c) hard segment. In some embodiments, the combinationof polyols comprises at least 0.2, e.g., at least 0.3 mole fraction ofequivalents of crosslinker.

Generally, a “hard segment” is a low molecular weight difunctionalmaterial, e.g., a low molecular weight alkyl diol. In some embodiments,the molecular weight of a hard segment is no greater than 250 gm/mole,in some embodiments, no greater than 150 gm/mole, or even no greaterthan 100 gm/mole. In some embodiments, a hard segment comprises an alkyldiol, wherein the alkyl group contains 2 to 6 carbon atoms, e.g., 2-4carbon atoms. In some embodiments, a hard segment is 1,4-butane diol.Other exemplary hard segments include ethylene glycol (including di- andhigher order ethylene glycols), propylene glycol (including di- andhigher order propylene glycols), 1,3-propanediol, 1,3 butanediol,neopentyl glycol, 1,6-hexanediol, ethanolamine, diethanolamine,methyldiethanolamine, and phenyldiethanolamine. In some embodiments, acombination of hard segments may be used.

In some embodiments, the combination of polyols comprises between 0.19and 0.45 mole fraction of equivalents of hard segment based on the totalnumber of moles of equivalents of the (a) polyester diol, (b)crosslinker, and (c) hard segment. In some embodiments, the combinationof polyols comprises at least 0.25, e.g., at least 0.35 mole fraction ofequivalents of hard segment.

The “System Functionality” is defined as the total moles of equivalentsof both hydroxyl and isocyanate groups divided by the total moles of thepolyols and the multifunctional isocyanates. In order to obtain acrosslinked, thermosetting system the system functionality should begreater than 2. If the system functionality is 2 or less, little or nocrosslinking is achieved and the material is typically thermoplastic. Insome embodiments, the system functionality is greater than 2, in someembodiments, at least 2.05, or even at least 2.1. Typically, a highersystem functionality leads to greater crosslinking and a stiffer system.In order to achieve a desired elastic behavior, in some embodiments, thesystem functionality is no greater than 2.2, and in some embodiments, nogreater than 2.15. In some embodiments, the system functionality isbetween 2.05 and 2.2, inclusive, and in some embodiments, between 2.1and 2.15, inclusive.

Generally, the ratio of the moles of equivalents of isocyanate groupsover the moles of equivalents of hydroxy groups (NCO/OH) should beapproximately 1, e.g., between 0.8 and 1.2, inclusive, and in someembodiments between 0.9 and 1.1, inclusive. If NCO/OH ratio is greaterthan 1, the crosslink density will increase, leading to higher hardnessand lower elongation. If NCO/OH ratio is less than 1, the system willhave a lower crosslink density, leading to softer system and greaterelongation. Thus, the exact ratio of NCO/OH can be adjusted to obtaindesired mechanical properties. In addition, decreasing the NCO/OH ratiotends to make the system more hydrophilic and will typically havegreater moisture vapor transmission, which may be desirable inapplication benefiting from a “breathable” structure.

In some embodiments, it may be desirable to use an NCO/OH ratio ofgreater than 1 to ensure complete crosslinking. For example, the polyolsare typically hygroscopic and may carry water into the system. Thiswater tends to react quickly with available NCO sites making themunavailable for crosslinking with the hydroxy groups of the polyols. Insome embodiments, an NCO/OH ratio of at least 1.02, (e.g., between 1.02and 1.07, inclusive) and in some embodiments, at least 1.04 (e.g.,between 1.04 and 1.06, inclusive) may be used.

EXAMPLES

Exemplary elastic core layers were prepared using the materialssummarized in Table 1. The functionality (Fn.) of the materials is thenumber of moles of equivalents per mole of material, i.e., the number ofmoles of hydroxyl groups per mole of the material. The molecular weight(MW) is reported in grams/mole. The equivalent weight (EW), equal to theMW divided by the functionality, is reported in grams/mole ofequivalents.

TABLE 1 Materials used in the preparation of exemplary elastic corelayers. Material Description Fn. MW EW Source URETHALL polyester polyol2 2040 1020 HallStar 4050-55 PRIPLAST 3192 polyester polyol 2 2000 1000Uniqema BDO 1,4 butanediol (hard segment) 2 90 45 glycerolpropane-1,2,3-triol (crosslinker) 3 92.1 30.7 Sigma-Aldrich DESMODUR Iisophorone diisocyanate (IPDI) 2 222 111 Bayer MONDUR ML 4,4′ and 2,4′diphenylmethane 2 250 125 Bayer diisocyanate (MDI) DABCO T-12Dibutyltindilaurate (catalyst) — — — Air Products

General Procedure for Preparing a Urethane Layer.

General Compounding Procedure. The elastic polyurethane layers wereprepared as follows. First, the desired amounts of polyester polyol,hard segment, crosslinker, and catalyst were weighed into a MAX 40polypropylene mixing cup (available from Flacktec Inc., Landrum, S.C.).The filled cup was then inserted into a SPEEDMIXER DAC 150 FV high speedmixer (available from Flacktec Inc.), and mixed for 15 seconds at 3450rpm. The isocyanate was then added to mixing cup and the mixture wasmixed for an additional 15 seconds at 3450 rpm.

General Coating Procedure. Free films of the elastic polyurethane layerwere formed by depositing the mixed solution between silicone coatedpolyester release liners positioned above and below the coatingsolution. The resulting three-layer construction was pulled though aknife coating apparatus with the gap between the knife and the coatingbed set at approximately 50.8 microns.

Data Set A. Samples of an elastic urethane layer were prepared accordingto the General Procedure for Preparing a Urethane Layer. Thecompositions used for Data Set A are summarized in Table 2A. The amountsof each component are recorded both in grams (gm) and millimoles ofequivalents (mMol Eq.). In addition to the components listed in Table2A, one drop of DABCO T-12 catalyst was added to each composition.Additional details regarding the examples of Data Set A are provided inTable 2B including the mole fraction of equivalents of each polyol, thesystem functionality (Syst. Func.) and the NCO/OH ratio.

TABLE 2A Compositions of the urethane elastic layers of Data Set A.URETHHALL MONDUR 4050-55 BDO glycerol ML mMol mMol mMol mMol Ex gm Eq.gm Eq. gm Eq. gm Eq. A1 9.33 9.15 0.41 9.11 0.14 4.56 3 24 A2 8.16 8.000.36 8.00 0.21 6.84 3 24 A3 14.0 13.7 0.31 4.67 0.14 4.56 3 24 A4 12.212.0 0.18 4.00 0.21 6.84 3 24 A5 11.7 11.4 0.26 5.78 0.18 5.86 3 24

TABLE 2B Compositions of the urethane elastic layers of Data Set A. Molefraction of equivalents URETHHALL BDO Glycerol Syst. NCO/OH Ex 4050-55(hard segment) (crosslinker) Func. ratio A1 0.40 0.40 0.20 2.07 1.05 A20.35 0.35 0.30 2.10 1.05 A3 0.60 0.20 0.20 2.07 1.05 A4 0.53 0.18 0.302.10 1.05 A5 0.49 0.25 0.25 2.09 1.05

The test methods used to evaluate and compare the various samples aredescribed below.

Stress Relaxation was measured according to ASTM D412-06a, wherein thetensile stress at 30% strain decays less than 30% over a period of onehour (i.e., the “Stress Relaxation Test Method”). A 1.3 cm (0.5 inch)wide sample was placed in an INSTRON tensile tester. The sample wasstrained to 30%, i.e., the strained length of the sample was 30% greaterthan the initial unstrained length of the sample. The load required tostrain the sample by 30% was recorded as the Start Load (“SL”). Thenormalized start load (“NSL”) was calculated by dividing the SL by theoriginal cross sectional area of the sample. The End Load (“EL”) wasrecorded as the load required to maintain a 30% strain after one hourload. The normalized end load (“NEL”) was calculated by dividing the ELby the original cross sectional area of the sample. The ratio of thedifference between the Start Load and the End Load over the Start Loadwas multiplied by 100 to calculate the percent change in load reportedas the Stress Relaxation (SR) of the sample, i.e.,SR=100(SL−EL)/SL.The results are reported in Table 3A.

TABLE 3A Stress Relaxation results for Data Set A. Example A1 A2 A3 A4A5 Thickness (microns) 305 356 178 178 279 Peak Load (kgf) 0.355 0.4430.114 0.192 0.343 Start Load “SL” (kgf) 0.355 0.443 0.112 0.192 0.343Normalized Start Load 900 960 480 830 950 “NSL” (kPa) End Load “EL”(kgf) 0.274 0.368 0.054 0.144 0.281 Normalized End Load 690 800 230 620780 “NEL” (kPa) Stress Relaxation “SR” 23% 17% 52% 25% 18% Modulus (kgf)0.391 0.315 0.222 0.381 0.406

In addition, Tensile/Elongation testing was performed on each sampleaccording to ASTM D412-06a. The samples were 0.635 cm wide “dogbones.”The test was performed at a rate of 25.4 cm/minute. The results arereported in Table 3B.

TABLE 3B Tensile/Elongation results for Data Set A. Example A1 A2 A3 A4A5 Thickness (microns) 406 381 152 229 254 Peak Load (kgf) 3.30 3.850.59 2.13 2.40 Peak Stress (MPa) 12.5 15.6 6.02 14.4 14.6 Strain atBreak (%) 595 528 837 553 560 Elongation at Break (cm) 30.2 26.8 42.428.2 28.4

Comparing the results for Examples A1 and A3 to Examples A2 and A4,respectively, the present inventors determined that an increase in thesystem functionality led to a decrease in the stress relaxation. Inaddition, comparing the results for Examples A1 and A2 to Examples A3and A4, respectively, the present inventors determined that a decreasein the mole fraction of equivalents of hard segment relative to the molefraction of equivalents of the polyester polyol led to a decrease innormalized start and end loads, but an increase in the stressrelaxation.

Data Set B. Additional samples of an elastic urethane layer wereprepared according to the General Procedure for Preparing a UrethaneLayer. Guided by the results obtained with Data Set A, the compositionswere based on a ten-point design of experiments where the relative molesof equivalents of the various polyols in the combination of polyols(i.e., (a) the polyester diol, (b) the crosslinker, and (c) the hardsegment) were independently varied. The design space was selected suchthat the NCO/OH ratio was 1.05 and the system functionality was at least2. The ten-point design is summarized in Table 4A. The compositions usedfor Data Set B are summarized in Table 4B. In addition to the componentslisted in Table 4B, 300 ppm DABCO T-12 catalyst was added to eachsample.

TABLE 4A Ten-point design of Data Set B. Mole fraction of equivalentsURETHHALL Ex. 4050-55 BDO glycerol B1 0.250 0.450 0.300 B2 0.317 0.3670.317 B3 0.250 0.350 0.400 B4 0.250 0.400 0.350 B5 0.267 0.417 0.317 B60.267 0.367 0.367 B7 0.300 0.350 0.350 B8 0.350 0.350 0.300 B9 0.2830.383 0.333 B10 0.300 0.400 0.300

TABLE 4B Compositions of the urethane elastic layers of Data Set B.URETHHALL MONDUR 4050-55 BDO glycerol ML mMol mMol mMol mMol Syst. Ex.gm Eq. gm Eq. Gm Eq. gm Eq. Func. B1 11.7 11.4 0.93 20.6 0.42 13.7 6.048 2.10 B2 14.8 14.5 0.75 16.8 0.44 14.5 6.0 48 2.11 B3 11.7 11.4 0.7216.0 0.56 18.3 6.0 48 2.14 B4 11.7 11.4 0.82 18.3 0.49 16.0 6.0 48 2.12B5 12.4 12.2 0.86 19.0 0.44 14.5 6.0 48 2.11 B6 12.4 12.2 0.75 16.8 0.5116.8 6.0 48 2.13 B7 14.0 13.7 0.72 16.0 0.49 16.0 6.0 48 2.12 B8 16.316.0 0.72 16.0 0.42 13.7 6.0 48 2.10 B9 13.2 13.0 0.79 17.5 0.47 15.26.0 48 2.11 B10 14.0 13.7 0.82 18.3 0.42 13.7 6.0 48 2.10

Stress Relaxation and Tensile/Elongation tests were performed on eachsample, according to the procedures described above. The results aresummarized in Tables 5A and 5B.

TABLE 5A Stress Relaxation results for Data Set B. Thick. SL NSL EL NELSR Modulus Ex. (microns) (kgf) (kPa) (kgf) (kPa) (%) (kgf) B1 178 0.6442800 0.521 2260 19 0.811 B2 102 0.163 1240 0.156 1190 4 0.523 B3 1520.286 1450 0.226 1140 21 0.440 B4 203 0.322 1220 0.305 1160 5 0.514 B5160 0.345 1660 0.313 1510 9 0.552 B6 102 0.150 1140 0.143 1090 4 0.540B7 102 0.150 1140 0.145 1100 3 0.504 B8 127 0.163 990 0.158 960 3 0.464B9 114 0.168 1130 0.166 1120 1 0.768 B10 102 0.177 1340 0.154 1170 130.550

TABLE 5B Tensile/Elongation results for Data Set B. Peak Peak StrainStress at stated percent Thickness Load Stress at break elongation(kg-force) Ex. (microns) (kgf) (MPa) (%) 30% 40% 50% 60% B1 178 2.5422.1 451 0.118 0.172 0.191 0.213 B2 102 1.22 18.6 513 0.091 0.113 0.1180.145 B3 152 1.49 15.1 365 0.113 0.118 0.150 0.159 B4 203 2.22 16.9 3590.118 0.141 0.163 0.181 B5 160 1.80 17.3 411 0.122 0.141 0.159 0.186 B6102 0.52 7.9 390 0.086 0.091 0.122 0.118 B7 102 0.42 6.4 416 0.086 0.0910.118 0.118 B8 127 0.62 7.6 481 0.077 0.091 0.113 0.113 B9 114 0.86 11.6432 0.104 0.104 0.136 0.141 B10 102 0.60 9.2 424 0.100 0.127 0.141 0.145

A regression analysis was performed on the results obtained from DataSet B. The present inventors discovered a strong correlation between therelative mole fraction of equivalents of the various polyols and thefollowing mechanical properties: Normalized Start Load (NSL), NormalizedEnd Load (NEL), and Stress Relaxation (SR). The following correlationswere identified, wherein SLC is the correlated normalized start load(Equation 1 “EQ. 1”), ELC is the correlated normalized end load (“EQ.2”), and SRC is the correlated stress relaxation (“EQ. 3”). In thesefollowing correlations,

x is the mole fraction of equivalents of (a) the polyester diol;

y is the mole fraction of equivalents of (b) the crosslinker; and

z is the mole fraction of equivalents of (c) the hard segment;

wherein the mole fractions are based on the total number of moles ofequivalents in the combination of polyols; thus, the sum of x, y, and zis one.SLC=10,203x+66,635y+109,567z−7632x·y−194,384x·z−345,379y·z.  (EQ. 1)ELC=4102x+25,628y+75,297z+44,876x·y−148,769x·z−199,804y·z.  (EQ. 2)SRC=72x+2378y+967z−4062x·y+247x·z−6445y·z.  (EQ. 3)

In some embodiments, the relative amounts of the polyols are selectedsuch that mole fraction of equivalents of polyester diol (x) is between0.25 and 0.6, inclusive, e.g., between 0.25 and 0.35, inclusive. In someembodiments, the mole fraction of equivalents of crosslinker (y) isbetween 0.15 and 0.4, inclusive, e.g., between 0.3 and 0.4, inclusive.In some embodiments, the mole fraction of equivalents of hard segment(z) is between 0.2 and 0.45, inclusive; e.g., between 0.35 and 0.45,inclusive. For example, in some embodiments, the relative amounts of thepolyols will be selected such that mole fraction of equivalents ofpolyester diol (x) is 0.25 and 0.35, inclusive; the mole fraction ofequivalents of crosslinker (y) is between 0.3 and 0.4, inclusive; andthe mole fraction of equivalents of hard segment (z) is between 0.35 and0.45, inclusive.

Relying on these correlations, the properties of the core layer can beselected to provide desired properties by adjusting the relative amountsof the various polyols in the combination of polyols. In someembodiments, the relative mole fraction of equivalents of polyesterdiol, crosslinker, and hard segment may be selected in an attempt toprovide a desired stress relaxation, for example to match the stressrelaxation behavior of the material (e.g., fabric) to which it isbonded. For example, in some embodiments, the relative mole fraction ofequivalents of polyester diol, crosslinker, and hard segment areselected such that the correlated stress relaxation (SRC) is less than30, e.g., between 15 and 30, inclusive.

Alternatively, or in addition to controlling the stress relaxation, therelative mole fraction of equivalents of polyester diol, crosslinker,and hard segment may be selected to achieve a desired start load or endload. For example, in some embodiments, it may be desirable to maintaina desired level of end load to provide the appropriate fit and feel ofthe garment, or to prevent a loose fit. In some embodiments, therelative mole fraction of equivalents of polyester diol, crosslinker,and hard segment are selected to provide a correlated end load (ELC) ofbetween 500 and 2500 kPa, e.g., between 750 and 2000 kPa. In someembodiments, the relative mole fraction of equivalents of polyesterdiol, crosslinker, and hard segment are selected to provide a correlatedstart load (SLC) of between 500 and 2500 kPa, e.g., between 750 and 2000kPa.

A thermoplastic bonding layer was prepared by mixing 9 grams of PRIPLAST3192 polyol and 1 gram of DESMODUR I (isophorone diisocyanate), with onedrop of DABCO T-12 catalyst. This composition was coated following theGeneral Coating Procedure using an approximately 25 micron (1 mil)coating gap on the notch bar coater. Samples were allowed to polymerizeovernight and then one of the silicone polyester carrier liners wasremoved.

The urethane composition of Example A2 was then coated between the twothermoplastic bonding layers following the General Coating Procedureexcept that the mixed solution was deposited between two thermoplasticadhesive films positioned above and below the coating solution, ratherthan between to release liners. This structure was allowed to cure for24 hours at room temperature, forming an elastic thermoset core layerbetween the two thermoplastic bonding layers.

The resulting exemplary elastic bonding film is illustrated in FIG. 1.Referring to FIG. 1, elastic bonding film 10 includes elastic thermosetlayer 20, first thermoplastic bonding layer 31 bonded to first surface21 of layer 20, and second thermoplastic bonding layer 32 bonded tosecond surface 22 of layer 20.

The elastic bonding film was then cut into 1.3 cm (0.5 inch) wide stripsand bonded between two pieces of an elastic fabric supplied by VANITYFAIR using a top and bottom heated platen press at 149° C. (300° F.) anda pressure of 345 kPa pressure for 3 seconds. The resulting article 50is illustrated in FIG. 2. As shown, first thermoplastic bonding layer 31is used to bond elastic bonding film 10 to first piece of fabric 41.Similarly, second thermoplastic bonding layer 32 is used to bond elasticbonding film 10 to second piece of fabric 42.

The bonding force between the thermoplastic bonding layer and the fabricwas measured using a T-Peel test according to ASTM D1876-01. The bondingforce was 9.3 Newtons (2 pounds force).

The bonded sample was allowed to age for 72 hours at room temperature.The stress relaxation of the bonded sample was measured according to thetest method described herein. The stress relaxation after one hour at30% strain was 27.3%, which represents the approximate value of thefabric itself.

The elastic bonding films of the present disclosure may be used in awide variety of applications. For example, the elastic bonding films maybe used to adhere aesthetic and/or functional layers to fabric. Thefollowing non-limiting examples illustrate some representative uses forthe elastic binding films.

In some embodiments, the elastic binding films of the present disclosuremay be used to create bead-coated bonding films. An exemplarybead-coated bonding film is illustrated in FIG. 3. Bead-coated bondingfilm 110 includes elastic thermoset layer 120 and thermoplastic bondinglayer 132 bonded to second surface 122 of layer 120. Bead layer 140comprises a plurality of spherical beads 141 and/or irregularly shapedbeads 142 located at first surface 121 of elastic thermoset layer 120.At least a portion of the beads are positioned such that a portion eachbead is embedded in elastic thermoset layer 120 and a portion of eachbead extends above first surface 121 of layer 120. In some embodiments,bead-coated bonding film may be adhered to a substrate (e.g., a fabric)via the thermoplastic bonding layer. The exposed bead layer may thenprovide aesthetic (e.g., visual or tactile) features and/or functionalfeatures to the fabric.

Example C Bead-Coated Elastic Composite Film

Bead Coat Carrier Preparation. A transfer carrier liner was made byextruding about a 25 micron thick thermoplastic release layer of lowdensity polyethylene resin from Quantum Chemical, designated NA219-000and having a melt index of about 10, at about 240° C. on a 96 micronthick biaxially oriented support layer of heat stabilized polyethyleneterephthalate (PET) film. The transfer carrier was treated with anultraviolet corona while the polyethylene was molten to adhere thepolyethylene to the polyester.

Ordinary soda-lime glass beads obtained primarily from recycled glazingfrom Flex-O-lite Inc. from their Muscatine Iowa plant were treated viaspray drying with about 300 parts per million A-1100 amino functionaltriethoxy silane from OSi Specialties Inc. The silane was dispersed atabout 10 wt. % solids in a 95 wt. %/5 wt. % ethanol/water solution. Thebeads were dried at about 90° C. for 30 minutes. The treated beads werecascade coated on the transfer carrier at about 105° C. and subsequentlyheated at about 120° C. for about 1.5 minutes to partially embed thebeads.

The size distribution of the treated beads and irregularly shaped glassparticles was measured by sieving. The calculated averagecross-sectional diameter of the beads was about 58 microns. Theirregularly shaped glass particles were approximately equallydistributed throughout the bead size population with an average count ofabout 10% based upon the total count of the beads and the irregularlyshaped particles. 95% by weight of the beads and irregulars fell withina threefold cross-sectional diameter range of about 38 microns to about115 microns. The average count of irregular particles was based onparticles having at least one dimension equal to or greater than 38microns. The larger beads and the agglomerated beads were only looselyheld by the liner, such that mild surface abrasion could dislodge them.The beads having diameters below about 100 microns were heldsufficiently, so that a subsequent processing operation resulted in lessbead loss.

Thermoplastic Adhesive Film Preparation. A thermoplastic polyurethane(ESTANE 58213 obtained from Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio) wasextruded at 50 microns onto a kraft paper release liner using atwin-screw extruder to form a thermoplastic adhesive film.

A two-part elastic polyurethane composition was prepared as follows.Part 1 contained: 26.2 grams polyester polyol (URETHHALL 4050-55D), 0.92grams crosslinker (glycerol), 1.56 grams hard segment (1,4-Butane diol),and 2 drops DABCO T-12. Part 2 contained 12 grams MDI (MONDUR ML).

The thermoplastic adhesive film was oriented with the adhesive facing upand fed into a notch-bar coating apparatus. The bead coat carrier waslike-wise fed into the notch-bar coating apparatus with the beadsoriented down towards the thermoplastic adhesive film. The gap under thenotch-bar, between the two liners was set at 125 microns.

Part 1 and Part 2 of the two-part elastic polyurethane composition weremixed together for 20 seconds using a FLAKTEC mixer and subsequentlydeposited onto the thermoplastic adhesive film of the notch-bar coatingapparatus. The top and bottom films were then pulled through the notchbar assembly using a steady pulling motion. The composite film wasallowed to cure for approximately 24 hours under room temperatureconditions and then placed in a 70° C. oven for 8 additional hours tocomplete the cure of the two part elastic polyurethane.

The transfer carrier liner of the resulting bead-coated elastic bindingfilm was removed resulting in the smooth transfer of the glass beadsonto the surface of the cured and crosslinked elastic polyurethane. Thefinished composite film was highly elastic and exhibited a silky smoothfeel on the surface of the film. This silky smooth feel was surprisinglyretained when the film was stretched under tension considering that theinter particle spacing between the beads was being increased.

Example D

A sample of the bead-coated elastic composite film of Example C was cutinto a 5 cm (two inch) by 15 cm (six inch) section. The paper releaseliner protecting the thermoplastic adhesive was removed and the adhesiveside of the composite film was placed into direct contact with WHITESTARnylon/spandex TRICOT #442 elastic fabric from Vanity Fair. Thisfabric/film laminate was then placed in a heated platen pressmanufactured by Geo Knight & Co Inc., Brockton Mass. The press washeated to approximately 149° C. on both the top and bottom plates andthe press activated at 207 kilopascals of pressure for 10 seconds. Thefabric/film laminate was then removed from the press and allowed to coolto room temperature. At this point the bead coat liner was removed fromthe laminate thereby exposing the bead coat surface. The composite washighly elastic and the tactile feel of the laminate surface was judgedto be identical whether in its unstrained state or stretched to greaterthan 100%. The film laminate bonded to the fabric can serve to alter thetactile nature of the fabric without interfering with the fabricselastic behavior and also serve as a protective patch to improve theperformance and durability of the fabric.

In some embodiments, the elastic bonding films of the present disclosuremay textured. An exemplary textured bonding film is illustrated in FIG.4. Textured bonding film 210 includes elastic thermoset layer 220 andthermoplastic bonding layer 232 bonded to second surface 222 of layer220. First surface 221 of elastic thermoset layer 220 is textured. Insome embodiments, textured first surface 221 comprises semi-sphericalfeatures 241 and/or irregular features 242.

Generally, the average height and width of the features are at least 10microns. In some embodiments, the average height and width of thefeatures are at least 20 microns, or even at least 40 microns. In someembodiments, the average height and width of the features are no greaterthan 150 microns, in some embodiments, no greater than 100 microns.

In some embodiments, a textured bonding film may be adhered to asubstrate (e.g., a fabric) via the thermoplastic bonding layer. Theexposed textured surface may then provide aesthetic (e.g., visual ortactile) features and/or functional features to the fabric.

Example E

The bead coat liner of a sample of the bead-coated elastic compositefilm of Example C was removed revealing pockets in the liner surfacecorresponding to the locations of the beads. This release liner was theninput as the top liner in the notch-bar coating apparatus with thepockets facing down. The thermoplastic adhesive film was oriented withthe adhesive facing up and fed into the notch-bar coater. Part 1 andPart 2 of the two-part elastic polyurethane composition were mixedtogether for 20 seconds using a FLAKTEC mixer and subsequently depositedonto the thermoplastic adhesive film of the notch-bar coating apparatus.The top and bottom films were then pulled through the notch bar assemblyusing a steady pulling motion. The composite film was allowed to curefor approximately 24 hours under room temperature conditions and thenplaced in a 70° C. oven for 8 additional hours to complete the cure ofthe two part elastic polyurethane.

This resulted in an elastic composite film with a substantiallyidentical surface architecture as Example C, absent the glass beads. Thebeaded surface was reproduced by the elastic urethane core layerresulting in a textured surface with features corresponding to theindented structure of the liner. Surprisingly, the tactile nature of thetextured surface was virtually identical to that of the elasticcomposite film produced in Example C.

Example F

The paper release liner on the thermoplastic adhesive side of thetextured elastic bonding film produced in Example E was removed from thefilm. The film was then bonded to fabric as outlined in Example D. Theresulting laminate behaved in a similar fashion to the fabric laminateof Example D, absent the glass beads.

Various modifications and alterations of this invention will becomeapparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scopeand spirit of this invention.

What is claimed is:
 1. An elastic bonding film comprising an elastic,thermoset core layer bonded to at least one thermoplastic bonding layer;wherein the core layer comprises the cured reaction product of acomposition comprising (i) a multifunctional isocyanate and (ii) acombination of polyols comprising x mole fraction of equivalents of (a)polyester diol, wherein x is between 0.25 and 0.6, inclusive, y molefraction of equivalents of (b) crosslinker, wherein y is between 0.15and 0.4, inclusive, and z mole fraction of equivalents of (c) hardsegment; wherein z is between 0.2 and 0.45, inclusive; wherein the sumof x, y, and z is 1; wherein, the ratio of isocyanate groups to hydroxylgroups in the combination of polyols is at least 1.05; and the hardsegment is an alkyl diol containing 2 to 6 carbon atoms.
 2. The elasticbonding film of claim 1, wherein the system functionality of thecomposition is at least 2.05.
 3. The elastic bonding film of claim 1,wherein the relative mole fraction of equivalents of polyester diol,crosslinker, and hard segment are selected such that SRC is less than30, whereinSRC=72x+2378y+967z−4062x·y+247x·z−6445y·z.
 4. The elastic bonding filmof claim 3, wherein the mole fraction of equivalents of polyester diol,crosslinker, and hard segment are selected such that SRC is between 15and 30, inclusive.
 5. The elastic bonding film of claim 4, wherein themole fraction of equivalents of polyester diol, crosslinker, and hardsegment are selected such that ELC is between 500 and 2500; whereinELC=4102x+25,628y+75,297z+44,876x·y−148,769x·z−199,804y·z.
 6. Theelastic bonding film of claim 5, wherein the mole fraction ofequivalents of polyester diol, crosslinker, and hard segment areselected such that SLC is between 500 and 2500; whereinSLC=10,203x+66,635y+109,567z−7632x·y−194,384x·z−345,379y·z.
 7. Theelastic bonding film of claim 1, wherein the mole fraction ofequivalents of polyester diol, x, is between 0.25 and 0.35, inclusive;the mole fraction of equivalents of crosslinker, y, is between 0.3 and0.4, inclusive; and the mole fraction of equivalents of hard segment, z,is between 0.35 and 0.45.
 8. The elastic bonding film of claim 1,wherein the polyester diol is a five carbon dibasic acid polyesterpolyol.
 9. The elastic bonding film of claim 1, wherein the crosslinkeris a glycerol.
 10. The elastic bonding film of claim 1, wherein thetotal functionality of the composition is between 2.1 and 2.15,inclusive.
 11. The elastic bonding film of claim 1, wherein the ratio ofNCO groups to the OH groups in the composition is between 1.04 and 1.06,inclusive.
 12. The elastic bonding film of claim 1, wherein thethermoplastic layer comprises a urethane.
 13. The elastic bonding filmof claim 1, wherein the thermoplastic layer is a pressure sensitiveadhesive.
 14. The elastic bonding film of claim 1, wherein thethermoplastic layer is a heat-activated adhesive.
 15. The elasticbonding film of claim 1, further comprising a plurality of beadspartially embedded in the elastic core layer.
 16. The elastic bondingfilm of claim 1, wherein the elastic core layer comprises a texturedsurface, wherein the textured surface comprises features having anaverage height of at least 10 microns and an average width of at least10 microns.
 17. An article comprising a fabric and the elastic bondingfilm of claim 1, wherein the thermoplastic layer of the elastic bondedfilm is bonded to the fabric.
 18. The article claim 17, wherein thefabric has a stress relaxation, SRF, as measured according to the“Stress Relaxation Test Method” and wherein the mole fraction ofequivalents of polyester diol, crosslinker, and hard segment areselected such that SRC is less than 1.2 SRF, whereinSRC=72x+2378y+967z−4062x·y+247x·z−6445y·z.
 19. The article of claim 18,the mole fraction of equivalents of polyester diol, crosslinker, andhard segment are selected such that SRC is between 0.8 SRF and 1.1 SRF.